Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva vs Tim Heger Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W W L W W W L
Form
W W L W L L L W L LHead To Head: Silva 1 - 0 Heger
They have played 2 sets in total, with Silva winning 2 and Heger winning 0. The last match between Silva and Heger was at the M15 Prijedor, 13-05-2021, First, Clay with Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva | 1 |
| Tim Heger | 0 |
M15 Prijedor(13-05-2021)
6
3
7
5
| Silva | Stats | Heger |
|---|---|---|
| 63% (20-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 384 | Ranking | N/A |
| 259 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 25 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 0 |
| 55% (224-182) | Career Total W/L | 49% (111-114) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Kenin VS Potapova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
27 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Vekic VS Navarro PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-5 |
Stats 
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Tim Heger
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:50:0 | Average Match Time | 1:50:0 |
| 66% (43/65) | 1st Serve % | 62% (37/60) |
| 67% (29/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (19/37) |
| 59% (13/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (12/23) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (3/5) |
| 48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 35% (23/65) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Oliver Crawford
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
61%
(
47 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Dmitry Popko
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
34 of
68)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
53%
(
56 of
105)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
59%
(
29 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
38 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
112
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(6) 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Cannon Kingsley
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Collarini
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
57
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Alexis Galarneau
56%
(
67 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
81 of
131)
0
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
54%
(
28 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
44 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
59 of
131)
134
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Federico Agustin Gomez
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
6 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
37 of
48)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Steven Diez
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
8 of
22)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
48 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
97)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
45%
(
20 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
53%
(
52 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
55 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Heger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Justin Schlageter
Player
Tim Heger
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
10
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 4-6 12-10 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dax Donders
Player
Tim Heger
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Tim Heger
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
7
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Heger
Player
Nikita Mashtakov
74%
(
75 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
68 of
90)
4
Aces
0
14
Double Faults
5
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
12%
(
3 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
45 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
48 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Heger
Player
Enrico Giacomini
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
1
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (224/182) | Win/Loss | 49% (111/114) |
| 55% (515/427) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (255/252) |
| 52% (4631/4319) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2496/2487) |
| 59% (54/37) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (28/23) |
| 54% (170/145) | Clay Win/Loss | 49% (76/78) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 35% (7/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 1012 | Aces Total | 395 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 982 | Total Double Faults | 477 |
| 1:44:36 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 426.77 | Average Opponent Rank | 274.78 |
| 63% (17004/26895) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4055/6777) |
| 65% (11137/17004) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (2761/4055) |
| 49% (4834/9890) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (1150/2727) |
| 44% (1285/2942) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (281/691) |
| 42% (11220/26961) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2689/6774) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 51% (91/87) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (133/92) | Futures W/L | 49% (111/114) |
| 55% (222/403) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (110/223) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 57% (58/102) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (24/44) |
| 48% (61/127) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (25/59) |
| 85% (223/189) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (116/98) |
| 15% (223/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (116/18) |
| 19% (183/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 11% (109/12) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
